DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
BCMR Docket No. 2009-188
FINAL DECISION
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section 425 of
title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the case upon receiving the applicant’s
completed application on June 29, 2009, and assigned it to staff member J. Andrews to pre-
pare the decision for the Board as required by 33 C.F.R. § 52.61(c).
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated March 11, 2010, is approved and signed by the three duly
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to reverse the Coast Guard’s recoupment of her Reserve
enlistment bonus. She stated that when she enlisted on active duty in the regular Coast Guard,
she was not told that her Reserve enlistment bonus would be recouped. She alleged that she was
invited to enlist on active duty and that she is still earning that Reserve enlistment bonus through
“her continued service as an active duty Operations Specialist filling the same position” that she
did as a reservist.
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD
On May 15, 2007, the applicant enlisted in the Reserve for 8 years and affiliated with the
Selected Reserve (SELRES). She signed a Page 7 acknowledging having been advised that she
was eligible for a $6,000 SELRES enlistment bonus and having read and fully understood
COMDTINST 7220.1 series and ALCOAST 056/06.1 She was paid $3,000—the first half of her
SELRES bonus—upon completion of “A” School. She was never paid the second half of the
bonus because on October 22, 2008, she enlisted in the regular Coast Guard for four years. The
applicant submitted copies of her Leave and Earnings Statements showing that the Coast Guard
has recouped $1,558.33 of her SELRES bonus from her active duty pay.
1 COMDTINST 7220.1 states that a SELRES enlistment bonus will be recouped if a member enlists on active duty.
ALCOAST 056/06 refers members who do not complete their SELRES obligation to the recoupment policy in
COMDTINST 7220.1 and online.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On September 9, 2009, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted
an advisory opinion in which he recommended that the Board deny relief.
The JAG stated that under COMDTINST 7220.1, SELRES enlistment bonuses are paid
for the duration of the contract and that a breach of the contract causes recoupment of the
unearned portion of the bonus. COMDTINST 7220.1 expressly states that enlistment on active
duty will cause recoupment of the bonus. Therefore, the JAG stated, because the applicant did
not complete her SELRES commitment, she was not paid the second half of the SELRES bonus
and was sent a notice of overpayment regarding the unearned potion of the $3,000 she had
already been paid. He stated that the “indebtedness of $1,558.33 resulted from the prorated
amount of the unearned enlistment bonus that was paid to the member in accordance with the
time that was served” in the SELRES.
The JAG noted that the applicant had already requested waiver of the indebtedness
through the Coast Guard, and her request was denied. The JAG alleged that if the Board
“grant[s] the upholding of the reserve bonus, you will further entitle this member to an additional
$3,000.00 from the initial $6,000.00 that has not been paid to the member.”
RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On September 28, 2009, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the views of the Coast
Guard and invited her to submit a response within 30 days. No response was received.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
ALCOAST 056/06 authorizes an enlistment bonus of $6,000 for members enlisting in the
SELRES for at least six years. Paragraph 2 states that half the bonus is paid upon completion of
initial active duty for training (IADT) and half may be paid one year later if the reservist meets
SELRES participation standards. Paragraph 7 states that “information on recoupment of bonuses
should a member not satisfactorily complete a contract” is contained in COMDTINST 7220.1. It
further states that “commands shall initiate recoupment action on members who receive a
SELRES bonus and then do not meet satisfactory participation requirements.”
COMDTINST 7220.1 contains the regulations for all Reserve bonuses. Enclosure (2)
contains the regulations for SELRES enlistment bonuses. Paragraph 4 states that members
receiving an enlistment bonus should be counseled about their eligibility on a Page 7 (form CG-
3307), and the following template is provided:
Entry Type: Selective Reserve Enlistment Bonus (BON-2)
Reference: COMDTINST 7220.1 (series)
Responsible Level: Recruiting Office: _________
Entry:
(DATE): I have been advised that I am currently eligible for a Level _____ Selective Reserve
Enlistment Bonus as listed in ALDIST _______, which has been made available to me.
I am eligible to enlist for up to a maximum of ____ years. My bonus will be computed based on
_____ months of obligated service.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the contents and explanation of
COMDTINST 7220.1 (series).
(signature of member/date)
(signature of counselor)
Paragraph 4 of Enclosure (2) also states that reservists will receive the first half of an
enlistment bonus when they complete their IADT, which may include “A” School. Paragraph 5
of Enclosure (2) states the following:
Members will submit a request (enclosure (5) to this Instruction) for the remainder of the bonus
amount via their chain of command to HRSIC one year after having completed all phases of
IADT. HRSIC will make the subsequent payment within two pay periods after receipt of the
member’s properly endorsed request. Refer to enclosure (7) for termination and recoupment
procedures for members who fail to maintain eligibility requirements.
Paragraph 3 of Enclosure (7) states that bonus recoupment action will be initiated if the
member fails to perform the required drills and training; if the member leaves her bonus-eligible
rating or billet; or if the member separates from the SELRES “for any reason other than death,
injury, illness, or other impairment not the result of own misconduct. Separation or termination
from the SELRES includes active duty enlistment in the active forces … .”
Paragraph 4 of Enclosure (7) shows that bonuses are recouped on a pro-rata basis for
each month of the six-year (72-month) enlistment contract that the applicant did not serve in the
SELRES. For example, a reservist who serves only one year in the SELRES but who received a
$6,000 bonus for a six-year contract (which amounts to $83.33 per month of service) will be
entitled to just $1,000, and any amount in excess of $1,000 that has already been paid to the
member will be recouped.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant’s
military record and submissions, the Coast Guard’s submissions, and applicable law:
The Board has jurisdiction over this matter under 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a). The appli-
cation was timely.
1.
2.
The applicant alleged that it is unjust for the Coast Guard to recoup the unearned
portion of her SELRES enlistment bonus when she left the SELRES to enlist on active duty in
the regular Coast Guard because no one warned her about the recoupment. She noted that her
work as an OS3 remained the same after her integration into the regular Coast Guard. The Board
begins its analysis in every case by presuming that the disputed information in the applicant’s
military record is correct as it appears in his record, and the applicant bears the burden of proving
by a preponderance of the evidence that the disputed information is erroneous or unjust.2 Absent
evidence to the contrary, the Board presumes that Coast Guard officials and other Government
employees have carried out their duties “correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.”3
Under Enclosure (7) to COMDTINST 7220.1, SELRES enlistment bonuses are
recouped on a pro-rata basis when the member separates from the Reserve by enlisting on active
duty. The applicant had received half ($3,000) of the $6,000 bonus but had completed only 17 of
the 72 months of her Reserve contract when she left the Reserve. Therefore, the applicant has
not shown that the Coast Guard committed any error by recouping $1.558.33 from her pay after
she enlisted in the regular Coast Guard on October 22, 2008.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The applicant alleged that she was not warned when she enlisted on October 22,
2008, that her SELRES enlistment bonus would be recouped, and she herself apparently did not
ask about whether her enlistment in the regular Coast Guard would affect her entitlement to her
bonus for enlisting in the Reserve. The Board knows of no regulation that requires a Coast
Guard recruiter to inquire into a potential recruit’s prior receipt of bonuses to ascertain whether
one might be subject to recoupment. Such an inquiry would be prudent and would avert the
potential disgruntlement and financial hardship that the applicant in this case might have
suffered, but current regulations do not require it.
When the applicant was counseled about her SELRES enlistment bonus on May
15, 2007, she acknowledged having read and fully understood COMDTINST 7220.1, which
clearly states that SELRES enlistment bonuses are subject to recoupment if the reservist enlists
on active duty instead of completing her contract in the Reserve. She also acknowledged having
read and fully understood ALCOAST 056/06, which notes that SELRES bonuses may be
recouped if a member does not participate satisfactorily in the SELRES for the term of her con-
tract and refers the reader to COMDTINST 7220.1. Perhaps the applicant did not actually read
these regulations or, if she did, she must have forgotten them by the time she enlisted on active
duty. However, under these circumstances, the Board cannot conclude that the Coast Guard’s
recoupment of the unearned portion of her SELRES enlistment bonus is unjust.4
Accordingly, the applicant’s request should be denied.
2 33 C.F.R. § 52.24(b); see Docket No. 2000-194, at 35-40 (DOT BCMR, Apr. 25, 2002, approved by the Deputy
General Counsel, May 29, 2002) (rejecting the “clear and convincing” evidence standard recommended by the Coast
Guard and adopting the “preponderance of the evidence” standard for all cases prior to the promulgation of the latter
standard in 2003 in 33 C.F.R.§ 52.24(b)).
3 Arens v. United States, 969 F.2d 1034, 1037 (Fed. Cir. 1992); Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 813 (Ct. Cl.
1979).
4 For the purposes of the BCMRs, “‘[i]njustice’, when not also ‘error’, is treatment by the military authorities, that
shocks the sense of justice, but is not technically illegal.” Reale v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 1010, 1011 (1976).
The Board has authority to determine whether an injustice exists on a “case-by-case basis.” Docket No. 2002-040
(DOT BCMR, Decision of the Deputy General Counsel, Dec. 4, 2002).
ORDER
Lillian Cheng
George J. Jordan
Paul B. Oman
The application of XXXXXXXXXXXXX, USCG, for correction of her military record is
denied.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-214
The JAG admitted the record “does document that Applicant was advised in an Enlistment Package Check-Off List for a $6,000 enlistment bonus, in a Reservation Request for a $6,000 enlistment bonus, and in an Administrative Remarks (CG-3307) dated 08 March 2007, that he was eligible for a $6,000 SELRES enlistment bonus based upon ALCOAST 056/06.” The JAG stated that under ALCOAST 056/06, only members enlisting in a critical rating were eligible for the bonus, and PS3 was not cited as a...
The military record submitted by the Coast Guard does not contain either the Page 7 with the promise of the $6,000 enlistment bonus or his SELRES enlistment contract. 1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his completion of MST “A” School, his record shall be corrected to show that he is eligible for and...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-196
The JAG noted that under ALCOAST 064/07, the applicant was not entitled to an enlistment bonus because he had previously served in the military, and ALCOAST 064/07 states that bonuses were not available to enlistees with prior military service. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4,000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-078
1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his completion of MST “A” School, his record shall be corrected to show that he is eligible for and entitled to the second half of the $5,000 SELRES enlistment bonus he...
1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his completion of MST “A” School, his record shall be corrected to show that he is eligible for and entitled to the second half of the $5,000 SELRES enlistment bonus he...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-048
In support of his allegations, the applicant submitted a copy of a CG-3307 (“Page 7”), which was signed by him and his recruiter on the day he enlisted, May 25, 2007, and which states the following: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. SELRES Enlistment Bonus. SELRES Enlistment Bonus.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-005
1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. Although the JAG rec- ommended only that the Board make the contract voidable, the Board granted relief, finding that the recruiter had promised the applicant the bonus as an enticement to enlist and that, “whenever reasonable, such promises should be kept, especially when the member relies on the erroneous advice and gives due consideration for the promised benefit.” In BCMR Docket No. Although the...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-207
2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. Section B of the applicant’s enlistment contract incorporates the Page 7 documenting his eligibility for a $6,000 SELRES bonus. However, the applicant’s recruiter promised him the $6,000 bonus for enlisting, and the applicant has already given consideration on the contract by enlisting in the SELRES.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-017
On March 30, 2006, while serving on active duty in Bahrain, the applicant was counseled on a CG-3307 (“Page 7”) about his eligibility for a SELRES Affiliation Bonus as follows: I have been advised that I am eligible for an $1,800.00 dollar SELRES Affiliation Bonus. The JAG asked, “Why would Applicant accept a $1,400 SELRES affiliation bonus, when he could have waited to enlist at the end of the following month and receive a $6,000 prior ser- vice enlistment bonus for a six-year SELRES...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-020
This final decision, dated July 16, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly appoint- APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a boatswain’s mate, second class (BM2) in the Coast Guard Selected Reserve (SELRES), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a $3,000 SELRES Affiliation Bonus. The Page 7 dated September 27, 2008, which was submitted by the applicant, does not appear among the Page 7s entered in the applicant’s military record, which the...